Graham Moore

  • Angemeldet am: 2009-03-27
  • Letzte Anmeldung: 2010-11-23

Projekte

  • CTM (Manager, Developer, 2009-03-27)
  • CXTM (Developer, 2009-10-21)
  • Dublin Core (Developer, 2010-03-28)
  • Maiana public (Reporter, 2010-07-08)
  • SDShare (Manager, 2010-10-06)
  • Standards (Developer, 2010-03-28)
  • TMCL (Manager, Developer, 2009-03-27)
  • TMDM (Developer, 2009-09-16)
  • TMQL (Manager, Developer, 2009-03-27)
  • TMRM (Developer, 2010-03-28)
  • XTM (Developer, 2010-03-28)

Aktivit├Ąt

Gemeldete Tickets: 2

2010-11-23

22:09 SDShare Bug #3665: A rel= value for fragments?
Originally we did have a type in there for topicmapdata. I'll check with Marc why we took it out. I *think* we decide...
22:07 SDShare Bug #3670: The ID of fragment entries
Me neither. It might have been along the lines that the fragment id is not the topic id?
21:53 SDShare Bug #3676: 5.4.1 A clean start
Agreed, this text sucks.
It's currently only trying to say that you grab a snapshot merge it into the local map an...
21:50 SDShare Bug #3740: Why isn't sdshare:dependency an atom:link?
This is certainly nicer. Less extension elements etc. It comes down to how much pain do we cause by either removing t...
21:44 SDShare Bug #3707 (Rejected): Snapshot feed and sdshare:ServerSrcLocatorPrefix
Having established we do need it. My proposal is to leave it where it is.
21:41 SDShare Bug #3754: Impacts of sd:dependency unclear
The spec is not clear. Here is what it means :)
For each action you are about to perform wrt syncing a given colle...

2010-10-15

08:36 SDShare Bug #3666 (Assigned): Terminology change
Agreed.
08:36 SDShare Bug #3665 (Assigned): A rel= value for fragments?
We need this.
08:34 SDShare Bug #3705: Fragment creation algorithm outdated
This was for XTM 1.0 and related model semantics. I am tempted to say we standardize on current tmdm and XTM 2.0
08:33 SDShare Feature #3697 (Assigned): A RELAX-NG schema for SDshare
Yes, we should do this.

Auch abrufbar als: Atom